Digital Chum - Virtual fish guts and other nonsense

Let’s play a game!

Here’s a quick sampling of headlines from six major news sites, which include MSNBC, Fox, MSN, BBC, New York Times, and CNN. Each headline was  the main headline on the front page of the news agency’s website at around 1:30 PM on Monday, March 14th, 2011.

Here’s the game. Read the six headlines and guess which one is Fox News.

Searching for survivors

URGENT: Nuke Meltdown in 3 Reactors

Uranium rods ‘highly likely’ melting at Japanese nuclear plant, official says

Fuel Rod Crisis Fears at 3rd Reactor

Japan Nuclear Plant Hit By Second Blast

Meltdown alert at Japan reactor

I’m not going to give away the answer (especially since every person I’ve asked has easily gotten the answer right), but this game can be played any time of day on any day of the year… and it’s almost always a simple task to pick out the Fox News headline.

When headlines are simply more sensationalist on one news site, I find it amusing. When they’re misleading, I find it disturbing, regardless of the news organization.

Either way, it’s an easy game to play… and it’s almost always easy to spot Fox headlines.

Henry Waxman calls shenanigans

Henry Waxman calls shenanigans on anti-science Republicans…

“The new Republican majority in the House has a lot of power to write our nation’s laws, but they do not have the power to rewrite the laws of nature,” Mr. Waxman said. “Republicans in Congress can’t cure cancer by passing a bill that declares smoking safe. And they can’t stop climate change by declaring it a hoax.”

They can’t… but they continue to try.

Yeah. She’s my daughter.

Megan was eating a warm, chocolate-chip cookie/brownie thing and had gotten to the center where it was all melty and chocolately.

I said, "Is that my part?"

She says, looking around in the bowl, "No. Your part is… Oh, sorry. I already ate your part."

I’m so proud.

Colbert… O’Reilly… Pure awesome!

I just saw this this morning and had to share it. I’ve been wanting to comment on this since O’Reilly made his “tides” comment, but haven’t gotten around to it. Colbert does it just fine!

Yep. It works like that.

Amazingly, despite the fact that our current cold weather in the the US is perfectly consistent with the consequences of global warming, the pro-pollution, global warming deniers continue to insist that localized cold weather and snow means the planet is not warming.

I guess when you deny basic science (or remain willfully ignorant of it), reality is purely subjective.

Personal attacks in science denial

Orac, of Respectful Insolence, has a post about how global warming wasn’t "invented" by Al Gore, contrary to what many global warming deniers seem to think. However, the part I find especially interesting in his piece is his explanation of why denialists tend to attack people.

Here’s an excerpt:

If there’s one characteristic of denialists of all stripes, it’s that they have a strong tendency to personalize their dislike of their particular bete noir science.

[...]

The reason, of course, is that cranks can’t attack the science using good science and, of course, it’s far easier to attack a person than well-supported science. After all, all people have flaws that can be ridiculed or used as the basis of ad hominem attacks.

Like Orac, I’ve seen this from global warming deniers, anti-vaxxers, religious fundamentalists, and anti-evolution creationists. Whatever motivates them in their denial, it seems they share this common tactic of attacking the messenger.

…any messenger.

A global warming denier is like…

I was trying to come up with a good analogy to describe global warming deniers and, of three I created, some friends thought this was the best one.

A global warming denier is like an inspector checking out a crumbling, leaky dam that is in danger of collapse who, upon finding a small bit of dry concrete, exclaims, “See! There’s no problem! It all looks fine!”

I thought I’d modify it for some instances to read…

A global warming denier is like an inspector checking out a crumbling, leaky dam that is in danger of collapse who, upon displaying a small bit of dry brick from a completely unrelated building in a neighboring town, exclaims, “See! There’s no problem! It all looks fine!”

…or, in many cases…

A global warming denier is like an inspector checking out a crumbling, leaky dam that is in danger of collapse who, upon finding a small bit of wet concrete, acts as if it’s dry, and exclaims, “See! There’s no problem! It all looks fine!”

One friend suggested this one, which I found amusing.

A global warming denier is like a guy living on a planet that is getting measurably warmer due to pollution and, for political reasons, latches on to  [...]

About Science

Two things are certain about science.  It does not stand still for long,and it is never boring.  Oh, among some poor souls, including evenintellectuals in fields of high scholarship, science is frequentlymisperceived.  Many see it as only a body of facts, promulgated fromon high in must, unintelligible textbooks, a collection of unchangingprecepts defended with authoritarian vigor.  Others view it as nothingbut a cold, dry narrow, plodding, rule-bound process — the scientificmethod: hidebound, linear, and left brained.

These people are the victims of their own stereotypes.  They aredestined to view the world of science with a set of blinders.  Theyknow nothing of the tumult, cacophony, rambunctiousness, andtendentiousness of the actual scientific process, let alone thecreativity, passion, and joy of discovery.  And they are likely toknow little of the continual procession of new insights and discoveriesthat every day, in some way, change our view (if not theirs) of thenatural world.

Kendrick Frazier, “The Year in Science: An Overview”
1988 Yearbook of Science and the Future
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

My three questions for candidates

People have different ways of selecting a candidate in any given elections, sometimes changing their selection method from election to election depending on current events. Some focus on a candidate’s position on the big issue of the day, some on a plethora of smaller issues, some one the tone of campaign ads, some on a specific hot-button issue, some on the candidate’s political party, some on what their chosen party tells them to do.

My approach is generally to focus on a few main questions (three in this example). Sometimes it’s hard to find the candidates’ answers to the questions and sometimes the candidates will hedge when answering, but to me, the answers to these questions say much more about the candidates than just their positions on the issues at hand.

Question #1: What is the candidate’s position on abortion?

This one has many shades of gray (funding, age limits, accessibility, notification, etc), but the focus of my question is on the candidate’s position about the morality of abortion. Should a woman have the right to choose whether or not to get an abortion? Usually, candidates will be fairly black and white on this issue.

Why this question?
It reveals something important  [...]

And therein lies the problem

Tea Party Sign - Listing the Federal Government as a dependentThe Tea Party movement is all the rage in the media these days and, depending on the source, it’s either a long-overdue raising of voices by fiscally responsible, small-government Constitution supporters or it’s a ludicrous outcry of misinformed, ultra-right-wing, white Christians.

The problem, it seems, is that the Tea Party seems to be a bit of both. This charge is almost always vehemently denied, usually by those of the latter group who fancy themselves part of the former. The differences show up fairly clearly when various Tea Party leaders are interviewed.

For instance, Toby Marie Walker, the cofounder and president of the Waco Tea Party, said the following when asked about the issues on which they focus:

Well, we focus around three main issues; constitutionally limited government, free markets and fiscal responsibility. A litmus test that we use is about taxes or spending, and we focus on those issues because that’s what we were founded under.

It’s hard to argue with  [...]

Our cats are not spoiled

Our cats love to hang out on the window sills, especially when the windows are open. They bird-watch and chatter at squirrels or just sniff the air, looking all relaxed and happy. I often thought it would be nice if they could go outside in a controlled area just to get a better view and find more sun.

So… since I had some free time the past four months (*cough*), I decided that I would create just such an area for the cats… a cat veranda, if you will. It was an adventure.

The base I first made the base out of some scrap wood we had in the garage. I was going to make the enclosure frame out of wood too, but upon further consideration, 3/4″ PVC pipe seemed like it would be easier… and easier means faster means I’ll actually finish the project. That was easily decided.

Planning a moderately elaborate “box” made out of PVC is not as easy as one might initially believe. Most hardware stores don’t carry three-point “corner” pieces in the  [...]

Bug’s Demo Reel

To help my niece sell her thoroughbred horse, Bug, I created this demo reel of her riding and jumping him so prospective buyers could see him before they made the drive out to meet him.

I shot it using a Kodak Playsport and a Kodak Zi8.